When it comes to choosing cut-resistant gloves, understanding the right safety standards can be confusing. ANSI and EN 388 are two critical standards, but they differ significantly.
ANSI/ISEA 105 and EN 388 are two different glove safety standards, primarily varying in testing methods and rating scales.
Each standard has its own way of measuring cut resistance, and knowing these differences helps ensure the right glove is chosen for your needs.
What is the EN 388 rating for gloves?
The EN 388 rating system is one of the most widely used glove safety standards globally. But what does it measure, and why is it important?
EN 388 measures the performance of protective gloves against mechanical risks like cuts, abrasion, tearing, and puncture.
Dive deeper into EN 388 ratings
EN 388 evaluates gloves using the following parameters:
- Abrasion resistance (Rated 1–4): Tests the glove's durability when rubbed against rough surfaces.
- Cut resistance (Coup test) (Rated 1–5): Measures the blade rotation required to cut the glove under constant force.
- Tear resistance (Rated 1–4): Indicates how much force is needed to tear the glove.
- Puncture resistance (Rated 1–4): Tests the glove's strength against sharp objects like nails.
Since 2016, EN 388 also includes the ISO 13997 test, represented by letters (A-F), to measure cut resistance under higher forces. This update addresses limitations in the original Coup test, particularly for materials that blunt cutting blades, like certain high-performance fibers.
EN 388: Ideal for European markets
The EN 388 rating is mandatory for gloves sold in Europe. It gives buyers a clear understanding of glove performance in multiple categories, but its reliance on both the Coup test and ISO 13997 can sometimes lead to confusion.
What is the difference between EN 388 and ANSI?
If both standards measure cut resistance, why are they so different? Understanding the distinctions can help you make informed choices.
The primary difference lies in their testing methods and how they define protection levels.
How EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 105 differ
Here’s a comparison of their key aspects:
| Feature | EN 388 | ANSI/ISEA 105 |
|---|---|---|
| Geography | Used mainly in Europe | Primarily used in the U.S. |
| Cut test method | Coup test & ISO 13997 | Straight-edge test (TDM machine) |
| Cut test unit | Newtons or resistance levels | Grams of force required to cut |
| Rating system | Letter grades (A-F) + numbers | Numeric levels (A1–A9) |
EN 388's Coup test involves a rotating blade, whereas ANSI uses a straight-edge blade that applies consistent pressure. As a result, ANSI ratings are often viewed as more reliable for modern high-strength materials.
Why the distinction matters
The testing methods reflect regional preferences. For example, in Europe, manufacturers may prefer gloves optimized for multipurpose risks (cuts, abrasion, puncture). In contrast, U.S. industries often emphasize cut protection alone, making ANSI more relevant.
What is ANSI/ISEA 105?
This American standard helps industries ensure their gloves meet stringent cut-resistance needs. But what makes it unique?
ANSI/ISEA 105 is a U.S. standard for evaluating the performance of protective gloves in various workplace risks, focusing heavily on cut resistance.
Dive deeper into ANSI/ISEA 105
ANSI/ISEA 105 measures gloves across three categories:
- Cut resistance: Tested using the TDM machine, which applies force to a straight-edge blade to determine the grams needed to cut through the glove.
- Puncture resistance: Evaluates the force required to puncture the glove with a pointed object.
- Abrasion resistance: Uses a sandpaper-like surface to determine the glove’s durability.
The standard was updated in 2016 to introduce nine cut-resistance levels (A1–A9) for better precision. These levels range from light-duty applications (like packaging) to extreme risks (like heavy metal fabrication).
| Level | Grams of Cut Resistance | Examples of Usage |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | 200–499 g | Light material handling |
| A3 | 1000–1499 g | Assembly work, warehouses |
| A9 | 6000+ g | Glass handling, heavy machinery |
ANSI provides highly specific guidance, making it a go-to standard for industries like construction, glass handling, and heavy manufacturing.
What are the ANSI levels for cut resistance?
Cut resistance levels can be confusing without a clear breakdown. How are ANSI levels defined, and what do they mean in practical terms?
ANSI levels are determined by the force in grams required to cut through glove material, ranging from A1 (lowest) to A9 (highest).
)
Dive deeper into ANSI cut resistance
Here’s a simplified overview of the levels and their typical applications:
| ANSI Level | Force (Grams) | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | 200–499 | Light assembly, minimal risks |
| A2 | 500–999 | Packaging, general warehouse work |
| A3 | 1000–1499 | Moderate risks like small blades |
| A4 | 1500–2199 | Glass cutting, medium metalwork |
| A5 | 2200–2999 | Sheet metal handling |
| A6 | 3000–3999 | Automotive, heavy industry |
| A7 | 4000–4999 | High-cut risks, like large knives |
| A8 | 5000–5999 | Extreme sharpness in manufacturing |
| A9 | 6000+ | Maximum protection for industrial use |
ANSI provides an easy-to-follow framework for industries requiring high-precision cut resistance. However, businesses often need to balance this with other glove features, like grip, comfort, and dexterity.
Conclusion
ANSI and EN 388 represent two distinct approaches to assessing cut-resistant gloves. While ANSI prioritizes precision in cut resistance, EN 388 offers a broader evaluation of mechanical risks. Understanding these differences ensures the right glove is chosen for any specific task.
